Comparison between Mockoon and MockFly's API mocking services
Discover the differences between MockFly and Mockoon API mocking services: cloud offer, features, and more
What is MockFly?
MockFly is an online API mocking service focused on quickly creating mock REST endpoints for development, testing, and prototyping. It provides a browser-based interface to define endpoints, configure multiple responses, add dynamic rules, and generate fake data with Faker.js or AI.
MockFly is a paid service with a free tier that includes limited daily requests and project quotas. It also offers collaboration features for teams working on shared mock APIs.
Screenshot of MockFly's interface
What is Mockoon?
Mockoon is a set of open-source tools that allow developers to mock APIs quickly and easily. It offers an offline-first and privacy friendly desktop application to design and run mock APIs locally. A CLI and various libraries are also available to deploy your mock APIs anywhere: CI/CD pipelines, servers, etc.
Mockoon features include a powerful templating system to generate dynamic and realistic mock data, a rules system, a proxy mode to partially mock API endpoints, and many customization options: status codes, dynamic headers, TLS, file serving, etc.
Mockoon Cloud is also available for teams and organizations looking for a cloud-based solution. It enables teams to collaborate on API mocking projects and share mock APIs with others by deploying them to the cloud.
💡 Get started with Mockoon: Download Mockoon or Discover Mockoon Cloud
Screenshot of Mockoon's interface
Offer comparison
Below is a comparison of the main characteristics of MockFly and Mockoon's respective offers:
| MockFly | Mockoon | |
|---|---|---|
| Offline/Cloud based | Cloud only | Offline and Cloud |
| Tools provided | Online interface and Chrome extension | Desktop application to design your mock CLI, Docker image and GitHub Action to deploy anywhere Web application for our Cloud customers |
| Free/paid | Freemium with free tier | Free for the open-source tools, paid for the Cloud |
| Billing | Individual plans and team seats | Billed per seat |
| Main cloud features | Team collaboration, automatic documentation, and request analytics | Deployments, team collaboration and AI assistant |
| Open-source | ||
| Enterprise support |
Features comparison
While MockFly and Mockoon offer similar API mocking capabilities, they follow different approaches. Below is a comparison of their main features:
| API mocking Features | MockFly | Mockoon |
|---|---|---|
| Self-host | A CLI, Docker image and GitHub Action are available to deploy in headless environments | |
| Proxy mode | Documentation | |
| OpenAPI support | Documentation | |
| Recording | Browser extension can capture requests | Mockoon can create mock endpoints based on entering requests |
| CRUD operations | Automated CRUD endpoints with fake databases | |
| Response rules | Rules can match request parameters | Advanced system of rules |
| Dynamic/realistic data | Faker.js and AI generation available | Advanced templating system and AI assistant to generate realistic fake data |
| Callbacks/Webhooks | Callbacks system | |
| File serving | Documentation | |
| Custom headers | At endpoint's level | At endpoint's and server's levels Supports templating helpers for dynamically generated headers |
| Customizable status code | ||
| Routing patterns | Documentation | |
| GraphQL support | ||
| WebSocket support | Documentation | |
| Chaos testing | Error and timeout scenarios are possible | Simulate delays and error responses |
| Stateful mocking | CRUD routes and data buckets | |
| JSON Schema validation | Valid JSON schema rule operator | |
| Slow network/server simulation | At server's and endpoint's levels |
For more comparisons between Mockoon and other tools, check out our other articles:
Mockoon vs Beeceptor, Mockoon vs Microcks, Mockoon vs Mock Service Worker, Mockoon vs Mockable, Mockoon vs MockServer, Mockoon vs Postman, Mockoon vs ReadyAPI, Mockoon vs Requestly, Mockoon vs Stoplight, Mockoon vs WireMock Cloud