Comparison between Mockoon and MockServer's API mocking services
Discover the differences between MockServer and Mockoon API mocking services: cloud offer, features, and more
What is MockServer?
MockServer is a flexible tool used for mocking and proxying HTTP and HTTPS requests. It allows developers to create and simulate complex request-response behaviors for testing and development purposes. With MockServer, users can mock various scenarios by defining expected requests and corresponding responses, enabling the testing of edge cases and failure scenarios. It supports both REST and SOAP APIs and can be used for load testing and functional testing. Additionally, MockServer can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines to automate testing processes and ensure consistent API behavior throughout development cycles. Users can configure MockServer through a simple JSON configuration or programmatically via its Java and JavaScript clients.
Screenshot of MockServer's interface
What is Mockoon?
Mockoon is a set of open-source tools that allow developers to mock APIs quickly and easily. It offers an offline-first and privacy friendly desktop application to design and run mock APIs locally. A CLI and various libraries are also available to deploy your mock APIs anywhere: CI/CD pipelines, servers, etc.
Mockoon features include a powerful templating system to generate dynamic and realistic mock data, a rules system, a proxy mode to partially mock API endpoints, and many customization options: status codes, dynamic headers, TLS, file serving, etc.
Mockoon Cloud is also available for teams and organizations looking for a cloud-based solution. It enables teams to collaborate on API mocking projects and share mock APIs with others by deploying them to the cloud.
💡 Get started with Mockoon: Download Mockoon or Discover Mockoon Cloud
Screenshot of Mockoon's interface
Offer comparison
Below is a comparison of the main characteristics of MockServer and Mockoon respective offers:
| MockServer | Mockoon | |
|---|---|---|
| Offline/Cloud based | Offline | Offline and Cloud |
| Tools provided | Libraries in multiple languages | Desktop application to design your mock CLI, Docker image and GitHub Action to deploy anywhere |
| Free/paid | Free | Free for the open-source tools, paid for the Cloud |
| Billing | N/A | Billed per seat |
| Main cloud features | N/A | Deployments, team collaboration and AI assistant |
| Open-source | ||
| Enterprise support |
Features comparison
While MockServer and Mockoon offer similar API mocking capabilities, they have different approaches. Below is a comparison of the main features of MockServer and Mockoon:
| API mocking Features | MockServer | Mockoon |
|---|---|---|
| Self-host | Multiple libraries are available | A CLI, Docker image and GitHub Action are available to deploy in headless environments |
| Proxy mode | Documentation | |
| OpenAPI support | Documentation | |
| Recording | Mocks can be created from previously called endpoints | Mockoon can create mock endpoints based on entering requests |
| CRUD operations | Automated CRUD endpoints with fake databases | |
| Response rules | Advanced system of rules | |
| Dynamic/realistic data | Advanced templating system and AI assistant to generate realistic fake data | |
| Callbacks/Webhooks | Callbacks system | |
| File serving | Documentation | |
| Custom headers | At endpoint's and server's levels Supports templating helpers for dynamically generated headers | |
| Customizable status code | ||
| Route regex | Documentation | |
| GraphQL support | ||
| Slow network/server simulation | At server's and endpoint's levels |
For more comparisons between Mockoon and other tools, check out our other articles:
Mockoon vs Beeceptor, Mockoon vs Mock Service Worker, Mockoon vs Mockable, Mockoon vs Postman, Mockoon vs ReadyAPI, Mockoon vs Requestly, Mockoon vs Stoplight, Mockoon vs WireMock Cloud