Comparison between Mockoon and Mock Service Worker's API mocking services
Discover the differences between Mock Service Worker and Mockoon API mocking services: cloud offer, features, and more
What is Mock Service Worker?
Mock Service Worker (MSW) is a JavaScript library that enables developers to intercept and mock network requests at the browser or Node.js level. It works by creating a service worker that captures outgoing HTTP requests, allowing developers to define custom responses for testing and debugging purposes. MSW is commonly used to simulate API responses during the development process, enabling testing without relying on actual backend services. It supports REST, GraphQL, and other request formats, making it versatile for various use cases in front-end and back-end development. MSW operates as an alternative to other API mocking tools like Mockoon.
Screenshot of Mock Service Worker's code
What is Mockoon?
Mockoon is a set of open-source tools that allow developers to mock APIs quickly and easily. It offers an offline-first and privacy friendly desktop application to design and run mock APIs locally. A CLI and various libraries are also available to deploy your mock APIs anywhere: CI/CD pipelines, servers, etc.
Mockoon features include a powerful templating system to generate dynamic and realistic mock data, a rules system, a proxy mode to partially mock API endpoints, and many customization options: status codes, dynamic headers, TLS, file serving, etc.
Mockoon Cloud is also available for teams and organizations looking for a cloud-based solution. It enables teams to collaborate on API mocking projects and share mock APIs with others by deploying them to the cloud.
💡 Get started with Mockoon: Download Mockoon or Discover Mockoon Cloud
Screenshot of Mockoon's interface
Offer comparison
Below is a comparison of the main characteristics of Mock Service Worker and Mockoon respective offers:
| Mock Service Worker | Mockoon | |
|---|---|---|
| Offline/Cloud based | Offline | Offline and Cloud |
| Tools provided | JS libraries | Desktop application to design your mock CLI, Docker image and GitHub Action to deploy anywhere |
| Free/paid | Free | Free for the open-source tools, paid for the Cloud |
| Billing | N/A | Billed per seat |
| Main cloud features | N/A | Deployments, team collaboration and AI assistant |
| Open-source | ||
| Enterprise support |
Features comparison
While Mock Service Worker and Mockoon offer similar API mocking capabilities, they have different approaches. Below is a comparison of the main features of Mock Service Worker and Mockoon:
| API mocking Features | Mock Service Worker | Mockoon |
|---|---|---|
| Self-host | Available as a JS library | A CLI, Docker image and GitHub Action are available to deploy in headless environments |
| Proxy mode | Documentation | |
| OpenAPI support | Documentation | |
| Recording | Mockoon can create mock endpoints based on entering requests | |
| CRUD operations | Automated CRUD endpoints with fake databases | |
| Response rules | Advanced system of rules | |
| Dynamic/realistic data | Advanced templating system and AI assistant to generate realistic fake data | |
| Callbacks/Webhooks | Callbacks system | |
| File serving | Documentation | |
| Custom headers | At endpoint's and server's levels Supports templating helpers for dynamically generated headers | |
| Customizable status code | ||
| Route regex | Documentation | |
| GraphQL support | ||
| Slow network/server simulation | At server's and endpoint's levels |
For more comparisons between Mockoon and other tools, check out our other articles:
Mockoon vs Beeceptor, Mockoon vs Mockable, Mockoon vs MockServer, Mockoon vs Postman, Mockoon vs ReadyAPI, Mockoon vs Requestly, Mockoon vs Stoplight, Mockoon vs WireMock Cloud